UFOs versus proof for the ETH - there is no total smoking firearm

history channel documentary UFOs versus proof for the ETH - there is no total smoking firearm - yet. I'd be the first to recognize that. I'd propose however this is an instance of where there's smoke, there's smoke. The flame has yet to be seen through the smoke. There however must be something suggestive about the way of that smoke to drive bunches of individuals, even some entirely keen individuals, to acknowledge the likelihood of the UFO ETH. I mean the thought simply didn't pop out of the ether - out of nowhere. Something exceptionally suggestive is driving it. However, as noted, there has been no 'smoking weapon' confirmation.

So confidence in ET being here must stem not from one biggie bit of smoking weapon confirm yet from parts and parcels and heaps of little hints. That is much similar to whodunit murder puzzles. The liable party is uncovered toward the end by somebody sorting out a great deal of little intimations that, when established together, when everything falls, at last blame the killer.

We presumably inherently acknowledge they (ET) ought to be here - there's nothing to keep that from being the situation, and master realizes that likelihood has been strengthened once more, and once more, and again in science fiction books, short stories, motion pictures and TV scenes, and also documentaries of the composed or visual kind. However, in light of the fact that they could be here, or ought to be here, doesn't make an interpretation of instantly into conviction that they are here. All in all, why do we trust (well large portions of us at any rate) that that is the situation?